• Ok memes and political preferences aside, what is your take on the Tylenol-Autism debate?

      Share
      • It’s more bread and circus. There is NO way that they could have found a definitive link between Tylenol and autism in six months time. It’s just another distraction. Bringing down Tylenol is probably much more cost-effective than bringing down the vaccine industry. I’m not saying that Tylenol is definitely not contributing to autism, because it does have a lot of “inactive” ingredients that are not good for anyone, but I am not falling for it. What do you think?

        4 weeks ago
        • @apapacharte yeah I was wondering the same thing- how did they find the definitive link? So many variables! I’m not a Tylenol fan, buuuuuut, to result in autism? Little far fetched. Who conducted these studies?

          4 weeks ago
        • That has been my main point always. Clinical trials are essentially flawed because there are soooo many variables that it is impossible to come to ANY definitive conclusions about any drug. What is very clear is that all drugs cause more harm than good. That much is more than evident.

          But even if clinical trials did work to reveal statistical patterns, there is absolutely no way they could have found a definitive link. They just took the ONE drug that 99% of pregnant mothers may have taken during pregnancy and said, “there we go. We’ve got a culprit that’s not a vaccine”. That’s all it is.

          4 weeks ago